Thursday, February 12, 2009

What is Apologetics?

Last week at K-Life we asked some of our kids what Apologetics means and we got a variety of answers. Some of these replies were “a hit song by One Republic,” “the history of the war god Apollo,” and “the science of being sorry.” Although some did answer correctly, we were surprised on how so many of our students haven’t even heard of the word Apologetics. Now I consider myself pretty down to earth so I came into the assumption that not everyone would have a particular knowledge of the arguments within apologetics, but to have little understanding of the nature of this branch of Theology was disheartening. So what is the purpose of Apologetics and where does its purpose lie within the spectrum of theology?


There are three components of theology. The first one is Polemic Theology. The word polemic comes from the Greek word polemikós which means “to war.” Polemic Theology is then theology which is done in a warlike manner speaking against those whom you disagree with. This type of theology is done inside of the church, usually done in showing the error of thought or doctrine towards another believer or another denomination. Sadly this type of theology has been prevalent the majority of church history and has done more the divide the body of Christ than unite it. However, this type of theology is important when heresy is entering to the church and dividing it. The second type of theology is Irenic Theology. Irenic Theology is the opposite of Polemic because it is theology that is done peaceably. It accurately represents all views and doctrines even when you oppose them. This is the type of theology that I use most often when I teach. That doesn’t mean that you don’t study the “holes” and problems with a particular system of beliefs, but you have to accurately represent that branch of theology. The last branch of theology is Apologetics. We get the word Apologetics from the Greek word apologētikos which means “suitable for defense.” And that is exactly what Apologetics is, it’s theology that is done to defend the faith against those who oppose outside of the Church.

Peter tells us in his first letter to “…always be prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you..” (1 Peter 3:15). Skeptics out there bring up really good questions. If we don’t have the original manuscripts of the Bible, how can we trust we have and what it says about Christ and God? If God is good then why is their evil, and is that God really worth worshiping? These are great objections that dive into the heart of Christianity. And as the great Apologetic Norman Geisler said if we can’t answer these questions “then we may as well believe in fairy tales.” The truth is we have some great answers to these questions. The problem that arises though, do you know them? Do you even know of a book that you can use a resource when these questions come. Because all too often, I know of students who get sheltered their whole life from opposing views, but when they go to college and they experience the full force of these arguments. These students don’t know that we have great answers in response.

Want a great Apologetic resource book? Then check out Norman L Geisler’s “When Skeptics Ask” as well as Lee Strobel’s “A Case for Christ.”

5 comments:

seriouslymere said...

one republic! that was my answer...thanks for calling me out. gosh.

Tulsa K-Life said...

Is it to late to apologize? OH OH OH!

Anonymous said...

another great book is, "The Reason for God" by Tim Keller

Unknown said...

i have found that apologetics not only helps in defending your faith, but can also help in defining what your faith is.

謝明博馬陰人放購ˇ屁ㄉ人不董識貨ㄉ人精打細算ㄉ人霖宏百里緒恩駛溟含凾信攔醬油邱科信彰柏宏與簽纏t06單耳耽溺娟謝政道QKPb戲曲學院部大汐布袋戲model mode台北不婚獨子女 臺獨 said...

請你這一次不要再刪
跨宗教 跨領域
悉怛多缽怛囉阿門證據時效
Blogger 未分類文章 提到...

*Weiss 前世今生來生緣

「大師們。」她輕聲說:「他們告訴我的。他們說我活過86次。」

「帶著對任何有關輪迴轉世的科學論文的強烈渴望,我翻遍了醫學圖書
館。讀得越多,就越意識到,儘管曾認為自己頭腦的每方面都受過良好的
教育,但我的知識還是很有限的。有許多這方面的研究和出版物,都是由
知名的臨床醫生和科學家們實施、驗證並重複的,但是很少人知道。他們
有可能都錯了或者都被欺騙了嗎?證據是如此的確鑿,而我還是懷疑。不
管確鑿與否,我覺得難以相信。」

「這經驗再加上隨後其他病人的經驗,我的價值觀開始轉變,從物質轉入
精神,而且更關心人我關係,不再汲汲於名利,我也開始理解甚麼是可以
帶走而甚麼帶不走。確實,在這之前我一定也不相信肉體死亡後我們的某
一部份還有生命。」
* 於 March 12, 2009 02:46 AM 回應

*

57樓

57樓

「那幾週,我重溫了在哥倫比亞大學念一年級時所學的比較宗教課的課
本。在《聖經》舊約和新約全書中確實提到輪迴轉世。公元325年,羅馬康
斯坦丁大帝和他的母親海倫娜,將新約中關於輪迴轉世的內容刪去了。」

在《前世今生》一書中也提到,大師們通過凱瑟琳共示現了10餘次,談話涉
及到人類的不朽及生命的真正意義:「我們的任務是學習,豐富知識成為
神那樣的生命。直到我們可以解脫了,然後我們會回來教誨和幫助其他
人。」



蔡昀叡?"! 靈修

2009年3月11日 下午 12:04